Tensions Flare Between Obama and Clinton at SC Debate

  • Length: 7:36
  • Rating: 4.58 (1925 ratings)
  • Views: 697135' favoriteCount='1411
  • Author: Veracifier

Tags: argument  attack  barack  carolina  clinton  debate  democratic  fight  flap  hillary  obama  presidential  south  tension 

South Carolina Democratic Presidential Debate, January 21, 2008

Las Vegas Democratic Presidential Debate

  • Length: 9:51
  • Rating: 4.18 (127 ratings)
  • Views: 71975' favoriteCount='95
  • Author: Veracifier

Tags: 2008  biden  clinton  debate  democratic  dodd  edwards  election  kucinich  Las  obama  presidential  race  richardson  Vegas 

Democratic presidential candidates debate at UNLV in Las Vegas, Nevada, November 15, 2007

Primer Debate ZP-Rajoy: El Debate - 25/02/08

  • Length: 95:39
  • Rating: 4.58 (60 ratings)
  • Views: 9770' favoriteCount='36
  • Author: libertaddigitaltv

Tags: Debate  Digital  Libertad  Noticias  Rajoy  TV  ZP 

http://www.libertaddigital.tv Retransmisión íntegra del debate entre José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero y Mariano Rajoy.

Obama Clinton Ohio Debate- Tax Returns,Denounce/Reject

  • Length: 10:1
  • Rating: 4.46 (100 ratings)
  • Views: 42270' favoriteCount='66
  • Author: llamomanu

Tags: analysis  Anti  Barack  Clinton  commentary  commercial  Community  Debate  Farrakhan  Hillary  Jewish  news  Obama  Ohio  political  Returns  Semitism  Tax 

The segment of last night's MSNBC debate focusing on "Accountability and Credibility" was aimed at providing insight into each candidate's character. When Tim Russert posed questions to Hillary Rodham Clinton regarding her refusal to disclose her tax returns, Barack Obama let her respond on her own, without challenge or qualification. In other words, he didn't try to capitalize on a potentially controversial issue even though he had every right to (Obama disclosed his own tax returns upon the same request from the media). Clintons are legendary masters of nondisclosure. Hillary fumbled, and was failing this segment miserably. The focus then turned to Obama, and disclosure of the fact that he received unsolicited words of support from Nation of Islam leader and fellow Chicagoan Louis Farrakhan -- an issue that had nothing to do with Clinton whatsoever. Barack more than adequately responded to Russert's question, stating that he has always denounced him and the things that he said. It was clear that he has no association with the controversial leader and is completely opposed to his views. The matter should have been put to rest, right? Why did Hillary need to chime in, stating that "reject" would be a more appropriate word than "denounce"? Question: If you applied for admission to your dream university, would it be more heartbreaking to receive a "rejection" letter"or a denunciation" letter? A "reject" vs. "denounce" argument coming from a Yale educated attorney doesn't seem to make sense, at least on the surface. Introductory law school classes teach us that it is much easier to create doubt than it is to establish truth. Did she need to establish this doubt because she had just fumbled her disclosure question, and she needed to make Obama look as unclean as possible? Partly, but her motive was actually deeper than that. In the eyes of many Americans, Farrakhan represents the Black Threat. With Obama effectively disassociating himself from anti-Semitism and the controversial Black leader, doubts about him shrink, and his voting base grows even broader. Hillary was obligated to chime in because she needed to reverse the shrinkage of one of her most loyal bases - the moron vote.

2007 SC CNN/ YouTube Democratic Debate (Part 1)

  • Length: 6:20
  • Rating: 4.53 (212 ratings)
  • Views: 160644' favoriteCount='325
  • Author: Hobobob10

Tags: Anderson  Carolina  CNN  Cooper  Debate  Democratic  Presidential  South  YouTube 

This is part 1 of the 2008 Democratic Presidential Debate held in South Carolina on July 23, 2007. It was sponsored by YouTube and CNN and features questions asked by YouTube viewers.

Page: 1 of 12355

Next Page